Interesting discussion in the New York Times presenting many sides of the debate on legalized prostitution. In terms of the legal definition of trafficking, if a person is over age 18, then there must be force, fraud or coercion present if the person partakes in the commercial sex industry. If a person is under 18, lack of consent is presumed. Read on.
Is Prostitution Safer When It’s Legal?
Labor Laws, Not Criminal Laws, Are the Solution
CAROL LEIGH, BAY AREA SEX WORKERS ADVOCACY NETWORK
Legality Leads to More Trafficking
RACHEL LLOYD, AUTHOR, "GIRLS LIKE US"
Criminalize Only the Buying of Sex
MAX WALTMAN, STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY
Ignore the Stigma and Focus on the Need
MARTHA C. NUSSBAUM, UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
Nevada’s Legal Brothels Make Workers Feel Safer
BARBARA G. BRENTS, UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS
Legality Brings Protection and Better Care
CHIKA UNIGWE, AUTHOR, "ON BLACK SISTERS STREET"
Such Oppression Can Never Be Safe
NORMA RAMOS, COALITION AGAINST TRAFFICKING IN WOMEN
Nevada’s Legal Brothels Are Coercive, Too
STELLA MARR, SURVIVORS CONNECT
Jim Wilson/The New York Times
Prostitutes wait for customers at a legal brothel in Nevada.
Some say laws against prostitution unfairly victimize women. A Canadian court recently ruled that laws preventing brothels endangered prostitutes by forcing them to work on the streets. And as the recent Secret Service scandal makes clear, in Colombia, prostitution is legal in “tolerance zones.” But in Spain, prostitution is essentially legal, and the nation has become a magnet for sex trafficking. Can legalized prostitution ever be safe and free of exploitation? Or should laws against prostitution remain?