Friday, September 16, 2011

Trial set to begin for Botsvynyuk brothers in human-trafficking case

A trial has been set to begin for the two Botsvynyuk Brothers, who have been trafficking individuals from Ukraine to Philadelphia, promising lucrative jobs. Of course, this did not happen. Instead, they worked and lived in horrible conditions, and had to pay thousands of dollars for their trip to the United States.

Additionally, there is a visa program that grants victims "T-visas" for helping to prosecute their traffickers. Few participate.

Trial set to begin for Botsvynyuk brothers in human-trafficking case

September 13, 2011|By Michael Matza, Inquirer Staff Writer

"Band of brothers," the U.S. Department of Justice calls them.

But if you're thinking World War II, parachutes behind enemy lines, battlefield heroics - wrong band.

These brothers number just five, hail from Ukraine, and stand charged with one of the most insidious crimes in the illegal immigrant underground: human trafficking.

Omelyan Botsvynyuk, 52, and Stepan Botsvynyuk, 36, are set to go on trial Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Philadelphia. Two more are in Canada pending extradition. One is believed to be in Ukraine, wanted by Interpol.

Click here to find out more!

From 2000 to 2007, federal prosecutors charge, the brothers Botsvynyuk smuggled about 30 immigrants from their homeland to Philadelphia, promising them jobs, $500 a month, and free room and board.

Instead, the immigrants say, they were enslaved.

By night, they cleaned big-box stores and supermarkets, including Target, Kmart, Wal-Mart and Safeway, here and in New Jersey, Delaware, New York, and Maryland, according to court filings. They slept five to a bedroom on dirty mattresses or floors in Port Richmond rowhouses. Rather than paying them for their labor, the Botsvynyuks demanded $10,000 to $50,000 from each for the trip to America.

Those who tried to escape say they were beaten or sexually assaulted, and their families in Ukraine threatened.

Omelyan and Stepan Botsvynyuk have pleaded not guilty.

Their trial, which could last five weeks, is expected to pull back the curtain on what Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano has called one of the world's "most profitable" and hard-to-prosecute criminal enterprises, owing to victims' fear of reprisals for coming forward.

Trials such as the Botsvynyuks' are rare. But trafficking is not, according to immigrant-rights groups. Some estimate that 14,500 to 17,500 people, mostly women and children, are brought to the United States each year as peons. About 600,000 more are moved among other countries to be placed in servitude.

Experts say the victims fall into two categories: those who know their entry to America is illegal, and those who've been misled by traffickers into believing they are properly documented. Either way, they do not think they are signing on for enslavement.


To encourage victims to cooperate with law enforcement, Congress created the "T" visa program in 2000, granting U.S. residency to victims who assist authorities in prosecuting traffickers. But since 2002, only 4,750 T visas have been issued - a measure of the climate of fear in which the immigrants live.

In the Botsvynyuk case, eight of the illegal immigrant workers - six men and two women - are cooperating with the government. They are allowed to stay in the United States for the trial, and possibly longer if they receive T visas.

They "entered this country with dreams of great opportunity, only to find themselves living a nightmare," U.S. Attorney Zane David Memeger said when the indictment was announced last year. "They trusted this band of brothers . . . only to be rewarded with false promises. . . . No one trying to immigrate to this country should have to endure such mistreatment."

If convicted on all counts, the defendants face six to 40 years in prison and fines of $250,000 to $750,000.

According to court documents, the case began with a tip from overseas.

Brothers Mykhaylo and Dmytro Botsvynyuk, now 33 and 45, reportedly were seeking workers in Ukraine for their family cleaning company in Philadelphia. Several of their recruits were veterans of military service in Ukraine and were looking for jobs.

The Botsvynyuks appeared to have come to the United States legally on tourist visas but overstayed.

Prosecutors say the Botsvynyuks arranged Mexican tourist visas for their recruits and flew them out of Germany and Poland. From Mexico, unnamed associates of the Botsvynyuks allegedly gave the immigrants American-style clothing and instructed them how to sneak across the border, primarily into southern California. They then traveled to Philadelphia, where, the indictment says, brother Yaroslav Churuk, now 43, put them into work crews.

The Botsvynyuks' cleaning business operated under a variety of names, according to prosecutors.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel Velez has said the discount chains and supermarkets did not directly hire the immigrants and likely were unaware of their status.

Defense attorney Joshua Briskin, who represents Stepan Botsvynyuk, said in an interview the charges against his client "are just not true." The alleged victims, he said, are cooperating only because "they want green cards" for permanent U.S. residency.

Attorney Howard Popper, who represents Omelyan Botsvynyuk, echoed that line of defense. The government's witnesses, he said in an interview, "would like to get T visas. . . . That certainly motivates them to say whatever it is they are going to say."

The indictment provides a preview of their testimony:

One woman is expected to say she was bound and raped as punishment by Omelyan Botsvynyuk, whom investigators describe as the group's leader. He allegedly told a woman in Ukraine whose elder son escaped from the Botsvynyuks' American operation that her younger son's fingers and ears would be cut off and sent to her "unless she signed over her house as payment." He also is accused of threatening to kidnap a female worker's 9-year-old daughter and force her into prostitution to pay off the family debt.

Some prosecution witnesses are being flown in from Ukraine. For their protection, their identities will not be disclosed until they arrive here.

According to a trial brief, Omelyan Botsvynyuk's lawyers may try to introduce testimony that he was tortured in Ukraine and forced to flee after being attacked by a gang of criminals, including government operatives, "who pulled out his gold teeth and poured scalding water into his lap."

The government says such testimony, even if true, is irrelevant to the charges, and has asked Judge Paul S. Diamond to exclude it.

Anti-trafficking activists say they hope the case will embolden immigrants suffering in peonage to come forward.

A free national hotline, 1-888-373-7888, has been open for several years as part of the Human Trafficking Resource Center in Washington. In Pennsylvania, Sen. Daylin Leach (D., Montgomery) has introduced a bill to widely publicize the phone number.

"Human trafficking is a dark issue that no one wants to talk about and that no one thinks can happen in their communities," he said. "But it can happen anywhere."

Thursday, September 15, 2011

Kansas law falls short in combating human trafficking Read more: http://www.kansascity.com/2011/09/10/3133808/kansas-law-falls-short-on-human.html#ix

The Polaris Project evaluated Kansas in its second-lowest category for its human trafficking laws, while nearby Missouri is in the top category, saying it still needs to enact legislation to broaden investigation tools. This would include police training, offering more assistance to victims, vacating convictions for victims, and other such victim-support measures.


Even though Kansas’ governor and attorney general have been strong voices against trafficking, an analysis by the Polaris Project found that the state still lacks the full arsenal of laws considered “critical to a comprehensive anti-trafficking effort.”

A national anti-trafficking organization is giving Kansas low marks on state efforts to police human trafficking, but Missouri fares much better.

“Missouri is in the best category and Kansas is in the second lowest,” said Mary Ellison, director of policy at Polaris. “And that is interesting because (Kansas Gov. Sam) Brownback has been such a champion on the human trafficking issue. Kansas has gotten a start, but there is quite a bit more to do.”

Kansas received only four of a possible 10 points in a state-by-state analysis by Polaris, a Washington, D.C.-based advocacy group. Missouri scored seven out of 10 points in the same study.

“In Kansas, we are proud of our free-state history, and we are now bringing that strong spirit to the fight against the modern-day slavery known as human trafficking,” Brownback said in a written statement responding to the report.

The Republican governor added that his administration will continue to work with the state’s attorney general on the issue.

When he was in the U.S. Senate, Brownback co-sponsored the original federal anti-trafficking legislation in 2000 and has long been an advocate for tougher policing. And when he was majority leader in the Kansas Senate, Derek Schmidt, now the attorney general, successfully pushed amendments to the state’s existing human trafficking law that could force traffickers to forfeit their assets.

Schmidt said he would continue to discuss further steps Kansas can take to find, prosecute and incarcerate human traffickers. He added: “We welcome all suggestions, including these, and will continue efforts to strengthen our enforcement efforts.”

Human trafficking is a $32 billion a year worldwide industry, including in the United States, where sex and labor trafficking of Americans and immigrants are the most common forms of the crime. While Congress has passed tough anti-trafficking laws in recent years, the Polaris group said it’s increasingly important that states combat the crime on their own.

The Polaris study noted that Kansas still needs to adopt legislation that would broaden the state’s investigative tools. They include requiring training of local police, establishing an anti-trafficking task force, making victims aware of a national anti-trafficking hotline, offering more assistance to victims, allowing victims to file civil lawsuits against their traffickers, and vacating convictions for sex trafficking victims.

In Missouri, Rep. Anne Zerr, a St. Charles Republican who has championed tougher trafficking laws, welcomed the state’s relatively high ranking.

“I think we have gotten a lot done,” Zerr said, pointing to a new human trafficking bill signed into law last month by Gov. Jay Nixon, a Democrat.

The law toughens current laws, calling for prison terms of up to 30 years — and life in some cases — and adding fines of up to $250,000.

Though human trafficking once was thought to be a coastal phenomenon, Missouri and Kansas have emerged as prosecution hot spots.

In addition to some child prostitution cases brought under anti-trafficking laws, federal authorities in Kansas City prosecuted in 2009 what was then the largest labor trafficking ring uncovered in the United States. The scheme forced an estimated 1,000 immigrants from several countries to work for low wages cleaning hotel rooms.

Polaris’ ratings track 10 categories of state laws. Overall, 11 states, including Missouri, met most of the objectives the group maintains are needed to combat the problem. Fifteen met either five or six of those conditions and 15, including Kansas, met three or four.

The states with the lowest rankings were Massachusetts, West Virginia and Wyoming. No state met all the legislative goals.

To reach Mike McGraw, call 816-234-4423 or send email to mcgraw@kcstar.com.



Read more: http://www.kansascity.com/2011/09/10/3133808/kansas-law-falls-short-on-human.html#ixzz1Y0uBroP5

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

The Rights of Women and Girls in Kenya

Although this doesn't relate directly to human trafficking, it does speak to the rights of women and girls worldwide. For that reason, I wanted to share this article.

FGM: Kenya acts against unkindest cut

Kenya has become the latest African country to make female genital mutilation illegal. The practice is still widespread in Africa, despite African Union opposition

Message to UN women: No FGM
Message to UN women: No FGM Photograph: guardian.co.uk

Kenya has become the latest African country to ban female genital mutilation, with the passing of a law making it illegal to practice or procure it or take somebody abroad for cutting. The law even prohibits derogatory remarks about women who have not undergone FGM. Offenders may be jailed or fined or both.

Members of the Kenyan Women Parliamentary Association said it was a historic day. Linah Kilimo, its chairperson, said the move would improve school attendance. And Sophia Abdi Noor said:


I have fought for 18 years to achieve this legislation. Today is independence day for women. Men got their independence in 1963 – but today women have achieved independence from the cruel hands of society.


Unicef congratulated Kenya. Its child protection specialist in Kenya, Zeinab Ahmed said:


It is a great day for the girl child of Kenya. FGM is a serious violation of the rights of the child and of women. This bill gives an indication from government it is not just a cultural practice that can go on. The government has taken a bold step and will not tolerate any more violations. I applaud the work of Kewopa, the ministry of gender and the many other partners who have worked tirelessly to ensure that girls are protected from FGM.

Nobody imagines this means FGM will never take place again in Kenya, but making it illegal is a massive step towards changing attitudes and giving strength to those who oppose the practice. Kenya follows a number of African governments in outlawing the practice. According to the Pan African news agency, at the time of the African Union summit in June, which proposed prohibition of FGM, Benin, Ivory Coast, Djibouti, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guinea, Niger, Nigeria, Kenya, Central African Republic, Senegal, Chad, Tanzania, Togo and Uganda already had legislation against it.

But in nine countries (including some of those where it is illegal) it is still widely practised. In Djibouti, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Guinea, Mali, Sierra Leone, Somalia and Sudan, 85% of women undergo mutilation.